Independent Job Evaluation, CHILDREN 1ST
Click here to read or download more about this Case Study 
- CHILDREN 1ST is the working name for the Royal Scottish Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children (RSSPCC) and is a registered charity.
- 1968: new legislation made local authority social work departments responsible for investigating child abuse. The charity changed its name to reflect in 1995.
- With an income of about £10m, and operating over 40 services in 23 local authority areas, CHILDREN 1ST employs some 300 staff and has a team of over 1000 volunteers, spread across the whole of Scotland.
What did our client need?
- Our client’s pay and grading structure, loosely tied to local authority pay scales, was not suited to the next stage of its development.
- They required a new grading scheme, based on Job Evaluation, that was:
Effective and efficient; transparent; equal value compliant; fair, equitable and robust; developed through staff consultation; able to cover all roles. - Our client also wanted a linked, cost effective and accurate benchmarking system.
How did we help?
We:
- Recommended the best Job Evaluation scheme option and argued our choice. The Steering Group accepted.
- Drafted new forms and guidance notes for employees and line managers to record comprehensive role analysis information.
- Trained Job Evaluation panel members in the new method. They evaluated all roles. The findings were reviewed by line managers and the Chief Executive.
- Agreed benchmark jobs and external comparator organisations. Our client used existing contacts with other organisations in the same sector.
- Collected external data for a sample of about 20 jobs. We used this to recommend salary ranges, and the optimum method of market matching.
- Presented options with cost implications to the Steering Group. The Board agreed the final recommendation; our client communicated the outcome to employees.
(click on the picture for a larger view)
What challenges did we face?
- Ensuring consistent evaluations among panel members.
- Validating evaluation results against the organisation structure; resolving apparent anomalies.
- Understanding client view of performance related pay.
- Setting a fair level of comparison with the external market, retaining an incremental pay progression system.
- Developing a simple system, allowing efficient, clear communication.
What benefits did our client gain?
- Our client now has an equal pay compliant scheme that is well accepted in the public sector, where many of its job comparators are found.
- This enables a simple link with market rates for the future; minimum time, effort at future salary reviews.
- Our client’s fully trained evaluation team and systems can cope with future changes and new roles, as the organisation develops.
- Employees have a clearer understanding of how grades and salary are assessed, related to internal relativities and the external market.
Contact
- Paul Robertson, Head of Practice and Managing Director
- 0870 890 9882
- enquiries@wayshrc.com
Click here to read or download more about this Case Study
